With Museveni
seeming invincible for now, the only hope of succession is ironically a Muhoozi
project
Since Gen.
David Sejusa aka Tinyefuza kicked off a storm by claiming President Yoweri
Museveni wants to make his son, Brig. Muhoozi Kainerugaba his successor, Uganda
has not stopped talking. In 2002, Muhoozi authored a concept paper on the
reform of the army.
Museveni
invited him to present it to the army high command where Tinyefuza was.
Apparently, it took precedence over another concept paper written by the
generals. Someone leaked this to me. I wrote an article in Sunday Monitor
suggesting the president was positioning Muhoozi to take over the army.
Later
Museveni invited me to state house and over a cup of tea, he was willing to
listen rather than threaten. I declined to reveal my source but volunteered
advice on how to manage such leaks. Museveni may have been angry with me but he
did not show it.
We parted on
cordial terms. I have related with many Ugandan elites long enough to learn how
to deal with the reality of our politics patiently. Fate is a double crosser.
Tinyefuza, not me, may be the one go to jail for accusations of Muhoozi taking
over the army.
Claims that
Museveni is planning for Muhoozi to succeed him are in some ways good news.
This is because the problem I (and I think very many other Ugandans) have with
Museveni is that he wants to rule for life. Museveni is only 69 years this
year.
If he lives
as long as Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe (now 89 years and running for another
term), he has more than 20 years ahead of him. If he lives as long as Kamuzu
Banda of Malawi (he died at an official age of 99 although many say he was
104), Museveni has 35 more years to rule.
So if there is
a plan for Muhoozi to become president upon Museveni’s death, he may have to
wait a long time. In that case, Muhoozi, now 38, may inherit the presidency in
2046 – when he is 72 years and older than Museveni is today.
In 2005, I
wrote an article in Sunday Monitor that the best signal that Museveni intends
to leave the presidency is if he can appoint Muhoozi vice president. For then,
we can credibly envisage a succession.
Since 2006,
the opposition has proved incapable of mounting any meaningful challenge to
Museveni. Holding other factors constant, hope of regime change therefore has
to come from within the NRM or UPDF.
But with the
president firmly in control of the party and army, it is unlikely that any of
the other contenders – Tinyefuza, Amama Mbabazi, Rebecca Kadaga and Gilbert
Bukenya – has a chance. Therefore, the nearest chance to regime change seems to
be a Muhoozi project.
Debate on a
possible Muhoozi project has not speculated on its potential dangers and
benefits. Commentators focus on Museveni’s plan but never discuss the merits of
the potential successor. Let me also speculate but first warn the reader about
my conflict of interest: Muhoozi is my friend.
This may
colour my opinion of him but it also gives me better insight about him than
most people. Muhoozi is calm and reflective and tends to listen rather than
talk. He has grown in power, so it does not shock him. He is exceptionally
restrained and therefore less likely to abuse power.
Today the
average age of cabinet in Uganda is 71 years. A Museveni presidency may risk
keeping this old guard – and the incompetence and corruption it has presided
over – intact and therefore sustaining the status quo rather than delivering
change.
The counterpoint
to this fear is that although he is Museveni’s son, Muhoozi is not Museveni’s
generation. Rumor has it that Muhoozi has since 2003 come to exercise
considerable influence on the army. That he has shifted power inside UPDF from
the old guard – the Tinyefuzas – to a crop of young educated officers loyal to
him. If this is true, we need to look at the results of his influence.
The 1990s and
early 2000s were hard years from the UPDF. For then, an army that had promised
to become productive degenerated into a springboard for private profiteers.
UPDF officers created ghost soldiers, bought expired food rations, junk
military hardware, supplied air, and looted Congo as soldiers went without
uniforms or boots.
Consequently,
UPDF lost national credibility and suffered major defeats at the hands of the
LRA and the Rwandan army. I made my career as a journalist exposing these
dysfunctions.
After 2003,
Museveni appointed Aronda Nyakairima and a crop of more educated officers to
the top of army leadership. Right beneath them, a crop of young officers, many
of them recruited by Muhoozi, others closely allied to him and some who have
enjoyed his patronage took command positions.
Consequently, UPDF has turned out
to be the most reformed component of the Museveni administration.
Today it is a
formidable and professional fighting machine as its exploits in Somalia attest.
If rumours that Muhoozi is the one in control of the UPDF are true, then this
transformation should be attributed to Aronda and him as well. Indeed, it gives
a powerful signal about what the transition of power from Museveni to Muhoozi
portends.
If there is
any lesson to learn from this experience, it is that regardless of Museveni’s
clear nepotism on Muhoozi (witness his accelerated promotion), a change to the
son is certainly more desirable than his rule for the next 30 years.
The only way
critics can discredit Muhoozi would be by claiming that he is not the one in
charge of UPDF, which is one way of saying that after all, Museveni has not
placed him in charge of the army. A debate on the leadership qualities of
Muhoozi is the more important because regardless of one’s feelings, and given
experience, family succession in Uganda is possible or at least probable.
1 comment:
I agree with you Andrew about your take on The Muhoozi project,however his consistent promotions in the army have become a threat to the old guards. The old generals have a feeling that ranks can only be attained after fighting in a war which is a wrong perception. Credit to the reforms that are evident today through their intervention in the war torn areas.
Post a Comment